Taking a Stand
As a leader
you will find yourself challenged on a daily basis. Whether you are confronted by stiff
competition, the vagaries of the economy, or your chief organizational
antagonist (read: pain in your butt), you need to temper your response. When
you feel that you are under attack, the natural reaction is to
counterattack. This approach might feel
right and good in the short term. But in
the big picture, it is often more effective to take a stand that establishes
your position beyond the immediate situation. Look past the battle to the war.
As an
example, my institution was approved by multiple accrediting agencies. On one occasion we had successfully passed
all of the requirements for accreditation with an agency after a great team
effort. The agency informed us that
although we would be accredited, it was not going to make a formal announcement
of our status because it thought we were too controversial, and an announcement
would unsettle their ranks.
My team’s
(and my) immediate inclination was to file a protest and out the agency for its
intended pusillanimous behavior. However, as we discussed the matter, we agreed
that inciting conflict was a lose-lose proposition. The accrediting agency would look bad, to be
sure. But so would we, in that the rest
of the world would wonder why the agency was reticent to recognize our
achievement, and further, why we were already battling an agency that had just
approved us.
So rather
than attack, we contacted the accrediting agency and took a stand. We informed
the agency that it was widely known that we had applied for approval, and that
the education community expected some resolution. Consequently, we intended to issue a press
release immediately, explaining that we had received approval from the agency,
but had decided to decline the approval.
This way the agency would not have to either explain itself or conceal
its decision to approve but not announce its action.
Within 24
hours the agency issued a list of newly-accredited institutions. Ours was listed along with the other
acknowledgements. Our stance sent a
clear message to the agency, as well as to our own institution. Specifically, we were proud to be a member of
this organization, but we expected to be treated just as any member would
be. In the long run this tactic proved
quite successful. We eventually shared
resources with the agency, and our faculty took leadership roles in a variety
of activities. This would have been an
unlikely scenario if we had made the choice to fight.
Comments
Post a Comment