Second Chances
One of the
most difficult situations that leaders must confront is how to deal with a team
member who has acted out of bounds.
There are a variety of scenarios here.
Sometimes the member thinks that they can fix something on their own and
on the fly. Sometimes they think that
they understand an issue better than you or the team. Or sometimes they simply
think that they are smarter than the collective group (which includes you), and
that they are the white knight who will save the fair maiden.
The last
case is the easiest to address. This
person cannot be saved, and you cannot save them. This person is convinced that
the smartest person in the room has not arrived until they walk in. They are
convinced that their arrogance and disloyalty will be vindicated and
rewarded. You can’t change them. Cut
your losses.
The person
who thinks that they understand the issue better than you or the team is a
tough nut, as well. They may be
responsive to constructive criticism, but they will need to mend fences with
the team, as well as with you. They will
also need to understand that their input is valuable, but that in the end the
team moves ahead as a unit. No one’s
contribution can overshadow the consensus of the group. By the way, that sometimes applies to you as
a leader, as well. The willingness of
this person to come back to the team will be apparent and should help guide
your decision in how to deal with them.
This person could
ultimately end up falling either into the “smartest person in the room”
category, or into the category of the person who goofed by trying to fix
something on their own without understanding the ramifications. This latter category is often the easiest to
deal with. The person involved is likely
to be junior and relatively inexperienced.
They need guidance in basic process implementation, teamwork, and
politics. With luck, someone on your team will mentor this person and the team
will grow stronger as a result. If not,
it may be necessary for you to help this person understand the lay of the land
and work with both the person and the team to determine the best path forward.
Of course, these scenarios are generalizations. And we all know that no generalization is worth a damn. But generalizations are often a damned good place to start.
Comments
Post a Comment